Question of the Day Poll Results: Do you agree with Andy as the Tough Enough winner?

Yes - 47 percent
No, should have been Luke - 37 percent
No, someone else - 16percent

***

Question of the Day Reax: What's your reaction to the end of Tough Enough with Andy the winner?

Michael Hutcherson, PWTorch reader: I definitely feel Luke should have won. Besides being the tallest of the two I don't know what they see in Andy. I thought it was interesting that Vince said, "That's not who I would've picked," so I think we will see Luke again.

Clifford, PWTorch reader: I'm curious if Andy was set up to win all along. He was recently in FCW before the show was filmed, and was built as an underdog face against the heel Luke. The way he flew under the radar for 90 percent of the show and the fact that he had been in FCW was never brought up. I personally don't think the guy will ever draw a dime, but Vincen has proven he can do more with less. If Luke wasn't already the winner going in to the Final Two, I would have chosen Jeremiah, as I feel he had more potential to connect with a live crowd. Luke was, outside of the injured Martin, the best all-around, so I can only say him being undersized, and Andy being a big man must have came into play.

Lucas in Indiana: Andy winning is pretty much a joke if you ask me. He seemed to just walk through the motions the entire season and didn't really show me anything that made him stand out. Luke seemed to possess all the right talents include looks, in-ring ability, promo skills, and mannerisms that would take him a long way in making him a good heel. I had laugh when Andy was in the ring on Raw and said that "Luke wasn't even in his league" and that "he was embarrassed to be standing next to him." It was pretty much the other way around. It's a shame that Martin had to be eliminated, because him and Luke were by far the two that showed the most potential during the season. Jeremiah was good, too. Just a shame at the result. When he wasn't eliminated earlier and given he was the biggest guy in the competition and knowing WWE loves their big guys, it was kind of expected. Overall, though, I liked this season and how it was run, minus the end result. Hopefully there is a Season 2.

Robert, PWTorch reader: What a dumb decision by WWE. Andy is just another generic big man of which WWE has plenty to pick from in their roster. Did people suddenly forgot he couldn't cut a promo in crunch time against A.J.? He has no personality, no mic skills, and is boring in the ring. I will be surprised if he last more than a year for the company. Luke would have been a better choice. He is charismatic, has mic skills, is quick in the ring, and he would have a completely different look from all the stars WWE has right now.

Jeff in Michigan: I was somewhat disappointed in the decision going with Andy. He seemed so uncomfortable on the mic last night that I'm unsure if he's ready right now. It appeared that since Andy got a better crowd reaction, Stone Cold simply went off that and wanted to please the live audience. Luke is someone who can main event a pay-per-view in three months, and Andy can do the same in about a year maybe. Luke would have been a good challenger to John Morrison while Andy can feud with Miz, or better yet, tag team with Kane. Andy's weaknesses won't be exposed as much, and Kane can pass the torch to him.

We suggest these recent related articles...

WWE PPV REAX #1: "I wanted the biggest event of the summer to end with an exclamation point; it ended with a semicolon and a question"

WWE PPV REAX #1: Battleground finish generates mixed reactions...

WWE PPV REAX #2: In-Person Battleground Report on overall show, reactions, more